the art of overthinking
If you won’t read the relevant material why should I have a conversation with you?
I appreciate philosophy, I really do. I like thinking about life, hearing new ideas and seeing things in a new light. I like psychology too. I love thinking about the how the human mind works: why humans do things, say things, believe things. It’s all fascinating stuff. Generally. I have a few little problems though.
I get exceedingly bored and irritated when keen philosophers demonstrate their complete lack of common sense by rambling on about obvious or irrelevant things, trying to analyse life and words to the nth degree. If what you’re trying to say cannot be expressed in few simple sentences, with an easily understood example or two, it’s probably been unnecessarily over thought. Descartes’ Meditations could usefully have been reduced to a couple of sentences, along the lines of ” the only thing we can be absolutely sure of is that we exist in the present” (and indeed often is). The rest of it is sheer, illogical overthinking because he was trying to rationalise an irrational conclusion.
I also get exceedingly angry and frustrated when psychologists show their complete lack of understanding of humanity or animals, by devising ridiculous or cruel experiments that demonstrate findings that your average person on the street could have told you are obvious and natural. For instance, baby animals, when frightened, will seek comfort in a soft and warm bundle, not a cold milk dispenser.
In the end, I know it’s important to appreciate the knowledge and advances that both these fields have brought to humanity. I also know that I am intellectually both challenged and lazy, and my opinion is biased by my inability to make sense of huge screeds of nonsense. But I sometimes get the impression that the sort of people who are attracted to both fields professionally are devoid of common sense, pursuing subject matters that without the painfully long pieces of pseudo-intellectual writing or the unnecessary experiments, completely befuddle them.
Philosophy usually drives me dilly…especially when used in a theological context.
Though I am a big fan of Descartes famous quote. If you are a true seeker of truth etc…or something like that.
LikeLike
I guess I’m making a point. A lot of it is useful when you’re younger to help you see things in a different light. I’ve just reached a certain age where my concentration span is exceedingly limited and I’ve found that common sense from general life observation more often than not is more logical. People just want to feel clever a lot of the time. I don’t mind feeling foolish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem, I shall point out your foolishness whenever I come across it, okay? What are true blogpals for, right? LOL!
LikeLike
Thanks. Although I doubt you would be able to pick up on it. 🙂
LikeLike
Probably right. I get lost over words with more than two syllables, and I can’t see if you are ‘typing while wearing your underwear on your head.
LikeLike
Another in the spam. You must have been seriously misbehaving recently.
LikeLike
Yes! We should all only exercise our common sense and not analyze, because analyzing is a lot of work and often just leads us to more clearly articulate things that are true, or figure out what we’re committed to by taking a position on a philosophical issue, or concerned with when we see a psychological phenomenon! Sometimes people don’t think carefully about a subject because they’re too busy thinking carefully about a subject! And, man, those people who’s job it is to analyze and talk about concepts and relation to stuff, why do they waste so much time talking about concepts and relations? It’s just so damned obvious that our common sense can tell us how it all fits together! /sarcasm
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once again, using my faulty dictionary that I’m sure a website with 4000 random words on it will shame, common sense seems to be “the ability to think about things in a practical way and make sensible decisions”. In order to be practical (“connected with real situations rather than with ideas or theories”) a degree of analysis is required. Oh, I don’t know, I’m maybe thinking about this too much. 🙂
LikeLike
In the field of epistemology and Philosophy of Science evidence has a more complex definition than what you’d find in an average dictionary. The fact that you won’t appreciate this has more to do with you not wanting to educate yourself about the topics you’re discussing and less to do with my ‘over-thinking’ and ‘lack of common sense’.
TLDR: You’re a lazy dumb-shit
LikeLike
Well, I suppose at least you’re admitting that your overthinking and lack of common sense is part of the problem here. I’d already stated I’m dumb and lazy in my post, so there was little need to reiterate it with a rude tag-on. Please feel free to browse around my other posts as I’m sure they’re lacking necessary quadratic equations.
LikeLike
Yeah.. I’m just going to stop. You’re too stupid.
LikeLike
Thanks! I look forward to your next post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t read it, but I like it!
Actually, I get irritated with this as well. I feel like many arguments could be settled quickly if people didn’t get hyper-focused on words. Words are not numbers. We can’t overanalyze them and then treat them as such.
LikeLike
Thank you so much! I appreciate your careful consideration of the matter.
LikeLike
Love this post! As someone who wants to double major in psych or philosophy in college I find that they do make you think in ways that are intellectually stimulating, though they can become too much at times when applied extraneously. Even just by taking AP Psych last year I felt enlightened to learn about certain things, while other topics felt like common sense. Same with the small amount of philosophy I’ve read. A wonderful, concise post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Thomas! I’m delighted that such an intelligent, intuitive and studious person agrees with me. And I apologise for constantly smothering you with enthusiastic compliments. 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: equations and a holy number | violetwisp
Pingback: violetwisp