my favourite bible quotes part 2 – ten generations of bastards
A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD. (Deuteronomy 23:2)
Given that many Christians are still in spasm about the changes happening to the institution of marriage across the world, I thought it would be nice to examine the far-reaching consequences of having sex incorrectly.
If you are a benevolent deity, you’ll understand how repulsed you would feel if a baby was born to parents who hadn’t first undergone a marriage ceremony. You’d also see the logic in encouraging your faithful followers to discriminate against subsequent generations of besmirched little bastard babies for at least a couple hundred years.
Christians today continue to follow this Biblical teaching and spurn illegitimate offspring, and the offspring of that offspring, and the offspring of that offspring, for the mandated ten generations. I know this to be the case because they all faithfully follow the words of their man god, the character Jesus Christ, who made the following unequivocal statement:
For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. (Matthew 5:18)
Whew. Heaven won’t be corrupted by children born out of HOLY WEDLOCK. Such a shame that kids are born to divorced and remarried parents. Those are bastards in the eyes of the Lawd.
Wait, what if this is one of those optional Bible verses, like the ones against eating shellfish?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or the pro-polygamy ones
LikeLike
“Such a shame that kids are born to divorced and remarried parents.” Now that’s an interesting thought. Perhaps this was such a ridiculous idea that the Bible writers didn’t even bother to ask the god God how disgusted he would be by such children. Putting myself in the shoes of a benevolent deity who doesn’t want illegitimate children near him … offspring from divorce and remarriage – yuck!, for 20 generations I expect.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or even worse, what if it just happened from a clerical mistake? Some scribe puts down an “I” for one generation. Another scribe spills some ink so it looks like a “X.” Congratulations, God now punishes ten generations of kids because one married couple couldn’t have children the right way.
Oh, and I don’t think anyone asked their deity about it because nobody thought it was noteworthy that their deity hates illegitimate children for something that they couldn’t have helped if they wanted to.
LikeLike
A lot of scholars argue the Matthews Gospel envisaged a faith that was not separate to Judaism but continued to obey the Jewish law. Indeed we know that many of the early Christians continued to do so. The Edomites were one such Christian group. Eventually these groups were persecuted out of existence by the winner in the fight of rival ideas, that being Pauline Christianity.
We see the history written by the winners. But early Christianity is likely to have been a lot more Jewish than most imagine.
Theologians argue that the OT laws need to be interpreted through the prism of the completed work of Christ. Thus they argue moral laws still stand, but ceremonial law and laws relating to the theocracy of Israel no longer apply. But that is not what Jesus literally said.
People brought up in Christianity have got so used to interpreting it in a certain way, they genuinely struggle to understand these issues.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Discriminating against bastards is just as moral as discriminating against homosexuals. They really need to chuck them out of their churches too.
LikeLike
Why doesn’t god just send a lightning bolt to fry all those ugly frickin’ bastard babies? I mean he’s omnipotent and all…why wait for the bastards to have more bastards? A little fire and electricity would do the job nicely. Where’s Inspiredbythedivine when you need him?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Strictly speaking Jesus was born out of wedlock.
LikeLike
I wish I’d said that – oh, wait – I DID!
(3:28/4:11)
LikeLike
Sorry Arch, I was stealing your thunder.
See me as an Echo!
LikeLike
ECHO ECHO Echo echo —
LikeLike
They say imitation is the greatest form of flattery. So see me repeating your comment as a form of flattery.
LikeLike
Peter, you and I never have any problems, now Colorstorm – well, that a
jackasshorse of a different…color.LikeLike
I agree with the observation below that we need a sort of CS Whisperer, I find his statements very hard to follow. Perhaps I am just not enlightened enough. Though perhaps he is too spiritual for us.
In John’s Gospel, Jesus exasperates many people by not answering their questions and changing the subject and using figures of speech that the person he was talking to could not understand. Perhaps CS is emulating Jesus?
‘Then Jesus’ disciples said, “Now you are speaking clearly and without figures of speech.’ (John 16:29)
LikeLike
“Perhaps CS is emulating Jesus?” – I can only hope he takes it all the way – I’ve got the nails.
LikeLike
Peter, please be careful about mentioning ColorStorm. He sees right through you and knows it’s because the character Jesus is shining a light in this dark corner. The only reason people like you and Arch are ‘obsessed’ with CS is because you know that he’s right. (Or so he says.)
LikeLike
His blogsite is filled with my comments proving he is incorrect in his assertions, but these he keeps locked away in his Moderation cellar.
LikeLike
Yes you are correct Violet. I will try to discipline myself in future.
LikeLike
Good point. When the Holy Spook is your daddy though, I guess an exception is made.
LikeLike
“why wait for the bastards to have more bastards?” That’s a lovely point. Perhaps after 10 generations the ‘yuck’ gets diluted enough that he can look at them again. Remember, to understand the god God, you’ve got to think like a benevolent being.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know how to break it to those your post addresses, but Jesus was a bastard. His mother wasn’t married, only engaged to Joseph, who wasn’t her baby-daddy.
LikeLike
Just as well he didn’t breed, would have been embarrassing for the kids not being allowed to go to church …
LikeLike
Having to choose between Judaism and Christianity might have been a problem for the kiddies as well. To whack or not to whack, that would be the question.
LikeLike
On a different matter all together, why do Christians want to go to heaven and it says clearly in that verse that heaven and earth will pass, only the word will remain?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent question. Despite being a catholic for decades, I haven’t the faintest idea. I’ve heard that phrase 1000X and never stopped to really think about the implications…which is what you have to do with all religious teachings. I’m sure apologists would have an answer, which they have for everything on earth. Maybe James could tell you? Or Walley? Or hey…CS!
LikeLike
CS uses English in a way I can’t understand what he writes.
Apologists will sure have an answer. I hope my question will catch Wally’s attention, on second thought, I don’t want.
LikeLike
CS is nothing compared to High Arka. Have you met him? Violetwisp is the High Arka whisperer, because she’s the only one who can make sense of him and find the words to answer his comments (the rest of us have our heads explode).
LikeLike
I could have met him before he started visited Violet’s blog. I couldn’t understand a thing he said.
LikeLike
VW is an InsanityBytes whisperer as well – talk about being multi-lingual!
LikeLike
She definitely has talents!
LikeLike
In the medieval times, it was quite common in Europe, for the sons of priests, all born out of wedlock, as priests could not marry, to be allowed to study for priesthood. But they were not called the bastards of priests, rather they were called the “gifted youths” as if they were somehow singled out of the grand population by their talents, and not by nepotism.
At the same time high lords and knights could have sons who were publicly acknowledged as bastards, and these could carry their fathers coat of arms, were taught the military skills just like the legitimate sons and their dads, bought them their (very expensive) tools of the trade, namely a warhorse, armour and weapons. The only difference was, that there was this “thin red line” across their coat of arms and shield. So, that everybody knew them as bastards. And they were set last in line to inherit their fathers. In the end, if the legitimate sons died in combat (as sometimes did happen), the bastard could eventually inherit the father. It was a completely different thing all together to be born bastard son of a peasant than of nobility.
All this goes to show, is that the social norm, values, nor concepts of justice, fairness, or the “traditional” marriage, are not in any way dependant on the religious faith of the society, nor of the individual. Rather they are products of a number of varying things in the society starting from the economics, level of education, level of scientific research, traditions, and the religions often only work as excuses for what people think how the society should be arranged, though religious thoughts can greatly twist and limit our scope on what really, most likely is objective about the issue. And no gods appear ever to tell us different. There are just these ancient books, that are indistinguishable from some dudes pondering how the society should be arranged and trying to add on gods or other divine forces to give authority to their thoughts.
LikeLike
Actually, the Norman, William the Conqueror, who defeated England’s Anglo-Saxons in 1066, was known in France as William the Bastard, and quite likely among many of the Anglo-Saxons, as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Him too. Under the sacred Papal banner they invaded. And his brother bishop Odo went to battle beside him armour clad, leading his own troops, like was in the custom of bishops for most of Christendoms history. After all, they were necessarily born (wether bastard or not) in the ranks of the cavalry elite nobility, wich defined the “traditional values” of Christianity for over a thousand years. It seems though, that shopkeepers and other sort of capitalists have decided to define the “traditional values” of Christianity today, since they have usurped the position of political elite in the world from them cavalry men.
LikeLike
Be fair to William, he did build some big churches to thank the Pope Alexander the II for his endorsement of the invasion!
However relations did sour with the papacy a bit later:
The study of Christian history was a significant factor in me losing my faith. I could not see a divine loving being in the history of the Church, instead I saw the worst of humanity.
LikeLike
“All this goes to show, is that the social norm, values, nor concepts of justice, fairness, or the “traditional” marriage”
You must be mistaken Raut, because we all know traditional Christian marriage has been ruling the world for the last 6000 years since we were created. Only now, in the end times, is change occurring. Honestly, you people need to read some books. 😉
LikeLike
Absolutely —
LikeLike
Pingback: Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Announcing a series on religious hate groups & their methods. | Just Merveilleux
Speaking of moderation, VW, the only other blog that moderates my comments is I/B’s. Today, you posted this on her site:
Which I followed with this:
I’m posting it here just in case it never otherwise sees the light of day.
LikeLike
Feel free to delete the above ^ comment, VW, and this one as well.
LikeLike