what’s going on over at the bigot’s place?
There’s a charming little blog that some of you may have had the pleasure to encounter called Ask the Bigot. The blog host, Bigot, campaigns tirelessly for marriage inequality based on her experience being brought up by her loving mother and her lesbian partner.
Bigot’s blog is all about love. She loves her mum, she loves her step-mum, she loves lots of gay friends and she loves the Christian god God. Somewhere in this cosy sea of love, she hates the idea of gay people ever experiencing a committed relationship with someone they love, and is appalled by the idea of gay people ever being parents.
She sets herself up as an expert in the area of gay relationships and parenting and, oddly, she thinks her blog name is ironic. I stopped following Bigot several months back because her posts were simply too disgusting with her sickly sweet back-handed slaps at all gay people.
However, for my last post about gay marriage, she was one of the Christian blogs that I chose to ask for further information on how they suggest gay Christians live their lives in terms of romantic relationships.
She hasn’t replied, but a couple of her fawning crew (who, based on prior experience, could simply be her in another name, her editor, her editor’s husband, her own husband, or some of her husband’s congregation who have sworn loyalty to him in a signed document) had the strangest conversation around me that I thought would be nice to share.
-
(S)he might try consulting the laws of nature where ‘romance’ is nothing more than a ritualized courtship behavior practiced between only opposite sex individuals before they mate for the sole purpose of producing progeny.
I don’t understand why atheists don’t look to nature for the answers and solutions to their problems. They always query Christians-interestingly. If I maintained I had ‘science’ on my side and knew all the answers to/about life that have been perplexing humans since they crawled out of that monkey suit, I certainly wouldn’t continue to keep looking for ‘love’ in all the wrong places.
It is equally perplexing why they focus all their ‘tell me why your religion or why you believe” questions are targeted to Christians, only – is that because they think Islam is not one of the great religions- from which they may derive some answers/solutions to their questions/problems? I’ve yet to see a LBGTQ activist or atheist blog targeting or trying to convert Muslims to atheism- waddup widdat?
-
They can take down any Christian religious argument with ease. They do not have that ability with Orthodox Judaism for a variety of reasons but they might develop it in the future. They do not target Muslims I suspect because it is kinda hard to gas-light and name call your way out of a beheading,a stoning, or getting thrown from a roof. They have a kind of erotic exotica fetish with Islam–it is after all male dominated and very cruel–right up their ally. Let’s see them push this in the Muslim world. I am sure ISIS is deeply committed to LGBT rights.
-
I’m a naturalist. Do you have a response to the biological, evolutionary argument against SSM and parenting?
I am not aware of any LBGTQ persecutions or prosecutions in Vatican State- ‘ground zero’ for ‘radical’ and ‘homophobic’ Christianity – are you?
But, I am aware that the Catholic Church has provided the most consistent leadership, and majority funding and care facilities to battle AIDS-HIV, worldwide, since its spread throughout ‘gay’ western civilization communities. I am not sure what China, Soviet Union/Russia, NK, Cuba the Islamic nations or the other non-Christian strongholds have done to help these poor victims- if anything.
What are the Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist and Judaic positions on SSM or parenting? Why do you only target Christians? Does that ‘turn the other cheek’ philosophy attract you? Are you a bully?
The Bigot speaks for herself, quite obviously.
-
It’s going to be an interesting debate when the detractors of Western Civilization are forced to debate the merits of their religion, Atheism, with the growing Christian populations in Africa, South America and Asia. While they grow into the culture and philosophy that defines the Wests’ values, morals and successes, we’re being pulled down into the abyss of past, failed social, ethical and morally bankrupt philosophical systems.
How is that elitist white privilege atheist attitude going to play out in the minority communities? How will LBGTQ battle this oppressed, minority population? Will they be called bigots, haters or phobes?
Inquiring minds need to know.
-
I can only conclude that Bigot has hired a new editor with an even odder approach to dealing with unwanted input – abandoning full frontal attacks and opting for the disarming ‘distract and ramble’. The Bigot can’t speak for herself, quite clearly.
“I’ve yet to see a LBGTQ activist or atheist blog targeting or trying to convert Muslims to atheism- waddup widdat?”
because Islam is at least honest enough to say no we do HATE gays, and our “god” HATES them too. We kill them and we are proud. Where Christians pretend to be all lovey and then the fangs come out while they spit the poison. Simple as that. Islam is honest in their hatred and Christianity is not. (In general speaking terms because there are exceptions to every rule).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yeah and her science BS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
It sites more than 100 references.
Her arguments are easy to dismantle. Too easy. And yet she wouldn’t hear it if you spelled it out. Sad really. Another DP if I ever read one myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Christians pretend to be all lovey and then the fangs come out while they spit the poison.” Ooh, spot on. These people are the worst for that kind of thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bigot’s cult is frightening. It’s the kind of thing you’ll see on the news one day with lot’s of neighbours saying, “They kept mostly to themselves… I really didn’t see this happening. I’m shocked… Those poor children.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do you still follow her? I’m out of touch with her developments but find it amusing she still has anonymous ‘friends’ attacking people on her behalf.
LikeLike
I never followed her. However, after Pink raised her name the other day I popped over and hit Follow. She loathes me, which is nice. I found her on Prayson’s blog one day ages ago telling him how deep her hatred was. It was quite amusing 🙂
LikeLike
How could anyone loathe sweet little you? I’d forgotten about Prayson.
LikeLike
I know!
Prayson is changing his perspective on things. That’s why he isn’t posting anymore.
LikeLike
I always felt he was playing his brain short
LikeLiked by 1 person
Changing his perspective? Did you deconvert him, you little Zande-imp you?!
LikeLike
He never fully recovered from our abortion exchanges 🙂
I spoke to him recently and he’s shifting his focus onto the idea of sentience and AI. What this actually means I’m not entirely sure, but it probably has higher employment options than theology… ie. re-stating the same arguments presented 1,500 years ago for an invisible, inaudible, thoroughly undetectable being who, however, apparently really, really, really wants to be known.
LikeLike
“an invisible, inaudible, thoroughly undetectable being who, however, apparently really, really, really wants to be known. ” Fantastic!
LikeLike
Spread the Good Word 🙂
LikeLike
Look how clever I am! I worked out how to do it
LikeLike
You missed out “All-powerful”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True!
LikeLike
It’s a shame people like that think the way they do. However, they’re on the losing side.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is true
LikeLike
Indeed, most of them will die out in the next generation or so. There will just be the predictable hardcore pockets of nutters twitching in the hills with their guns to keep them company.
LikeLike
IMHO is Rivka Edelman, this woman: http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2014/10/rivka-edelman-is-ba-newmark-prolific-and-shocking-anti-trans-activist.html
I have verifiable evidence for that statement.
Other commenters include known anti-lgbt campaigners. More on that coming soon.
…do you remember a time when you thought my theory on the coinciding IP’s and orchestrated comments was crazy talk? 😛
LikeLike
Oh, I can’t wait, excellent detective work! I remember when she started commenting under her other pseudonym ‘Motherhood’ on Bigot’s site, and the editor character got very excited by her foul utterances.
When I asked in the conversation from this post if either of them have a blog I could check out, IMHO said she would be more likely to have publications than a mere blog. It’s so easy to call yourself an academic these days …
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s the annihilation ethics. A world where anything that contradicts their worldview is immoral, but lying, deceiving and promoting fraud is perfectly fine.
LikeLike
Jae says you look to nature to answer the question. As a naturalist, having looked at nature, I find there are many animals that exhibit homosexual behaviour. I will also add that the religions condemned it because they don’t know what to do with it, being quite obviously ignorant.
Apart from the beheading- an argument against revelation suffices for any religion based on revelation. An argument against deism suffices as an argument against all philosophers gods. So Jae should rest easy knowing we are not afraid of Muslims.
As for IMHO, what in OJ does she think we can’t take down? That god wears a silly hat? She can bring it on, we will take it down for her.
Jae says the RCC has provided the most consistent leadership in dealing with HIV-AIDS. I didn’t know this. Where are these centres run by the church? And if you know any Buddhist, Jae, you can send to them the questions asked by V.
Again for Jae’s information, there is a shift in Africa. Atheists are everywhere speaking up. Maybe they are white, I will have to reconfirm this. I have been thinking my atheists friends here at home were blacks, I could have been wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You should click on the link and reply to them!
LikeLike
She is bigot? Why would I want to visit declared bigots
LikeLike
After a while, it gets boringly repetitive.
LikeLike
Did you unfollow her too? I should really thank you for introducing us all to her …
LikeLike
I never followed her, I just popped in occasionally from the Homosexuality tag. I still get views from her.
Dialogue is a good thing if we are listening, but not if just picking at a scab by reading evil rubbish. Like a black person reading white supremacist stuff and feeling guilty about her/his skin colour. Or like a decent, upstanding Christian reading evil rubbish contrary to the Will of God as expressed in the Bible and thinking, ooh, that’s horrible! That’s wrong! I should not be reading this horrible, disgusting stuff! Ooh, maybe just a little bit…
LikeLike
She needs people to oppose her noxious rubbish though. Otherwise people of a delicate disposition could stumble upon her blog and not think the issues through clearly. You’re right it gets boring though …
LikeLike
I kept thinking of in regard to the blog title was many a truthful word is said in jest
I really don’t understand why Christians have made such a big deal out of gay marriage. The issue was never ‘marriage’, the issue was legalisation of homosexuality. In essence the fight against gay marriage is no more than a rearguard action in a battle that had already been lost.
The irony is that in the early church many Christians did not get legally married. Rather they had a Christian ceremony that was not recognised by the State. This was because the Christians disagreed with the marriage protocols of the Roman state (mainly about marrying outside of your class).
LikeLike
“the issue was legalisation of homosexuality. In essence the fight against gay marriage is no more than a rearguard action in a battle that had already been lost.”
It’s like when the washing machine was invented and women could go out to work, yet they’re still complaining. 😀
LikeLike